Government mandating vaccines Cam secret

But the fact that the new legislation is coercive does not make it ethically impermissible.

In fact, it can be argued that many laws are coercive but nonetheless considered ethically acceptable by most people.

Appeals to individual liberty cannot outweigh the importance of protecting public health.

Similarly, the risk of future outbreaks of infectious diseases that pose a risk to the life or the health of other people is a sufficiently strong reason to limit parents’ freedom of choice regarding whether or not to vaccinate their children.

So harming or risking harm to other people when the cost of avoiding it is so small, is unethical.

The Conversation UK receives funding from Hefce, Hefcw, SAGE, SFC, RCUK, The Nuffield Foundation, The Ogden Trust, The Royal Society, The Wellcome Trust, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and The Alliance for Useful Evidence, as well as sixty five university members.In fact, the most common side effect of vaccines – such as redness or swelling around the injection side – are very mild and soon disappear.The most serious side effects, such as anaphylactic reactions, happen in less than one in a million vaccinated people.The fines range from €500 to €7,500 (£436 to £6,540).I would argue that these measures are ethically justified, and other countries should follow the Italy’s lead. Most parents, even if they are opposed to vaccines, will have no choice but to vaccinate their children.

Search for government mandating vaccines:

government mandating vaccines-90government mandating vaccines-45government mandating vaccines-10

Unvaccinated children do represent a risk to other people, and vaccination entails a very small cost to parents and to children.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “government mandating vaccines”